gnommi: (Default)
[personal profile] gnommi
This morning I am reading about how the ideas of Derrida, Saussurean and post-Saussurean epistemological relativism and semiotics might impact upon taxonomy, specifically within the context of paleontology.

Considering that this is a consequence of a throwaway line in a book that I am reading for leisure and that before this morning I had no idea who Saussure or Derrida might be, I feel somewhat chagrined. Where are all the pretty pictures of trilobites? Of course, now I've started reading on the subject, who knows where it will end?

Next time I'll read That's Life!. Or maybe not. There was a stack of this and similar pulp fiction in my psychiatrist's waiting room yesterday, containing such gems as SCHIZOPHRENIC MONSTER SHREDDED MY SISTER and MANIAC KEEPER FATTENED ME UP FOR SICK SEX. Perhaps not the most apposite reading material, all things considered.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Would it be a fair assumption that yo've read Daniel Dennett? Metamagic thema's is a great place to start, and anyone who can suggest that philosophy and science aren't interrelated at a deep level after reading that is bonkers.

Did you know that Fred Hoyle inferred the energy levels of the carbon atom from the Weak Anthropic principle? These things go hand in hand.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
yeah I have read Dennett (though not in anger) and seen him speak live at the RSA and other places a few times. he makes a lot of good points but I can't say I always agree 100%. (ooh, get me!)

like you say, its a no-brainer that science and philosophy are indivisible, but I have a feeling that Conway-Morris is just having a gripe with big words so that he can justify slagging off Dawkins for being shallow, short-sighted and unduly obsessed with mechanistic minutiae

not that i disagree with him ;)

anyway it can't hurt to read up on all this stuff right? *remembers having a minor breakdown whilst trying to read Wittgenstein's Blue and Brown Books*

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I don't agree with everything Dennett says - when I understand him, which in the case of 'Godel, Escher, Bach' was up until about chapter 3.
I just like people who are much cleverer than me. If Dennett was a girl, I'd fancy him something rotten :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
you too, huh? one day, ONE DAY...
I WILL FINISH THAT BOOK!

frikkin mock turtle and his "don't go any further until you understand this"
pffft

but wasn't that Douglas Hofstadter?

erm dunno if i spelled that right

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
You're right, it was Hofstadter - I get confused because he & Dennett collaborated on 'The Mind's I'.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-05 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
Dennett has a beard too, so you can't even pretend convincingly

Profile

gnommi: (Default)
gnommi

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 2829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags